Consumers outraged by judge’s bank charge decision

June 12, 2007 by admin  
Filed under News, News-Banking

A number of consumers in the UK are outraged at the decision of a judge in Hull who plans to dismiss their court cases against a number of banks.

Around twenty customers who have taken their banks to court over reclaiming bank charges have been told that the cases are likely to be dismissed as a result of the recent case won by Lloyds TSB. Lloyds was the first bank to win a case, when the Birmingham judge ruled in the banks favour rather than in favour of the plaintiff, Kevin Berwick, who was seeking over £2500.

Despite officials from the Financial Ombudsman Service stating that the Lloyds TSB case is not a definitive one, the judge from Hull, Ian Besford, has cited this case in his decision to dismiss the cases against Lloyds TSB, Barclays, and HSBC. The cases are due to be heard on July 4th. A number of the consumers concerned have contacted the BBC with regards to the issue.

A spokesperson from Consumer Action Group stated: ‘Kevin Berwick lost in his case in Birmingham because he didn’t supply enough evidence. This judge in Hull seems to be striking out the claims before he has even seen the detailed evidence of each claimant.’

However, the judge has stated that he plans to dismiss the cases because there appears to be ‘no reasonable prospect of success in the light of the recent decision’ regarding the Lloyds TSB case.

This is the first judge to have referred to the Birmingham Lloyds TSB case in his decision. A court official from Hull stated: ‘It is entirely up to each judge to decide for himself if the Birmingham judgement is an interpretation of the law he agrees with.’

Tom Smith
12th June 2007

Tags: judge, bank, penalties, charges, ruling, fees

Related Entries

  • Appeals Court throws out bank charges appeal
  • Since the start of 2008 the High Court has been dealing with a battle between the Office of Fair Trading and the UK's banking industry over the controversial issue of bank charges for unauthorised overdraft
  • Court still allowing consumers to sue over bank charges
  • The row over unlawful and unfair bank charges has been raging for some time, and many bank customers have managed to reclaim past charged for exceeding the overdraft limit and for returned cheques and direct
  • Bank charge court claims need to be watertight
  • Experts have warned that consumers that are trying to reclaim bank charges from their banks through the courts need to make sure that the case they are putting forward is solid and watertight in order
  • Widow fined £800 by Northern Rock
  • A woman who previously had tens of thousands of pounds worth of savings with ailing bank Northern Rock was outraged when she was hit with an £800 fine from the bank for withdrawing her savings,
  • Banks filing further appeal over bank charges
  • The battle between the UK's High Street banks and the Office of Fair Trading over bank charges has been raging for some time, and has been longer than most people imagined. The case went to
  • Delay in bank charges decision from OFT
  • The Office of Fair Trading has announced a decision to delay the decision with regards to what can be construed as a fair bank charge for those that default on their current accounts. Many experts
  • Yorkshire Bank faces tough decision
  • The Yorkshire Bank is facing a tough decision over its overdraft charges following an order made by a judge in Hull. Over 40 cases were due to be heard last month by the judge, and
  • At least a million have their bank charge claims frozen
  • According to recently released figures at least one million consumers have their bank charge claims frozen, as the appeals relating to the original High Court decision continue. Claims over bank charges were frozen in 2007, after

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!