HIPs In Place For Three Bedrooms

Estate agents are warning that the new Home Information Packs (HIPs) are going to cause a shortage of larger properties on the market. One agency reported that the number of large homes on offer for sale is down by 40% over the last 12 months, and experts in the industry are blaming the packs for the problems. Each pack costs around £500, and they have been compulsory for homes with four bedrooms and more since 1 August.

The Government says that the packs will shorten the time of the buying process, but agents claim that they are actually putting off sellers and pushing up prices as they try to cover costs. Each pack must include an energy performance certificate and standard searches.

Estate agency Chancellors said that it had seen a fall of 42% in the number of large homes being brought to market since 1 August when compared directly with the same period in 2006.

Many sellers are unhappy with the process. Some say that it verges on interrogation, with questions on construction dates, central heating, loft insulation and the use of low-energy light bulbs, and multiple photographs throughout the property. Some people have seen the process through to sale, but many more have not. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) said that 53% of its members reported a drop in the number of four bedroom homes put on the market since 1 August, compared with the same period last year – worse even than the Chancellors figure. This fall has not been in line with expectations, despite rising interest rates, stock market turmoil and the credit squeeze, and HIPs are being blamed.

Now, since Monday 10 September, HIPs are required for homes with three bedrooms, despite warnings from those within the housing market.

Jeremy Leaf, housing spokesman for RICS, is unhappy with the way the government has handled the implementation. He said: “I have never known legislation so badly introduced. Homeowners clearly have no faith in the packs or the policy, which have only brought more bureaucracy and mass uncertainty to an already paralysed market. Before they are heaped on the rest of homeowners, we need to see some evidence-based justification that this policy benefits consumers. At the moment it doesn’t exist.”

Nick Salmon, an estate agent and founder of the campaign group Splinta (Seller’s Pack Law is not the Answer), said: “I cannot think of any [benefits consumers have seen from HIPs]. There is a great deal of anger among homeowners who do not see the point of these packs and consider them another stealth tax. HIPs have simply heaped more expense at the wrong end of the transaction, and sellers have nothing but contempt for the new law.” The Government stands to boost its coffers by the VAT applied to the Packs.

There are still loopholes in the law. Sellers can avoid a HIP by 1) converting a bedroom to a study, 2) cancelling a pack after it has been ordered, as it only need to be ordered, not actually purchased, 3) pay the £200 fine for not having a HIP – much cheaper than the £500 a HIP costs. In fact, getting caught is unlikely as trading standards officials admit they don’t have the resources to enforce the packs.

Mr Salmon believes the government is running the risk of drying up the housing market by introducing HIPs for three bedroom properties. Gordon Brown, he claimed, may rue the day he passed up the chance to kill of HIPs.

Tom Smith
29th September 2007

Tags: surveyors, information, house, home, bedroom, hips, fine, government