Water bills to soar over the next two decades

One of the UK’s biggest water suppliers, Severn Trent, has said that water bills are likely to soar over the next two decades. The water supplier predicts that over the next twenty years the cost of water bills will soar around 27 percent above inflation.

The supplier has put the increase down to rising operating costs and EU regulations, both of which it claims will cost the industry billions of pounds. The water industry was privatised in 1989, and since that time has made huge profits from increasing bills. However, despite the price increases water companies are said to have failed to carry out repairs and offered a poor level of customer service.

Severn Trent said that rules that have now been brought in by regulators will results in billions of pounds having to be spent over the coming years, and these operating costs are going to prove hard to handle by the water suppliers. The company said that the rising costs that would be incurred by the water industry would have to be passed on to customers, who would see their water bills rocket as a result.

An official from Severn Trent stated: ‘It is not clear such a continued high level of investment is sustainable in terms of whether it can be financed, whether customers are willing to pay for it and the detrimental impact on carbon emissions.’

The water regulator Ofwat has also ordered water suppliers to place a cap on bills over the next five year, with Severn Trent being told to cut its bills by 4 percent, which will also hit the supplier hard. The rising cost of borrowing, which is a problem for all businesses, is also going to play a part in the higher costs that customers will face.

Tags: water, costs, Severn Trent, year, water bills

First time buyers fail to budget effectively

A recent report has indicated that many first time buyers fail to budget properly before they make the move into their new home, and often receive a shock when they realise that they outgoings are going to be far higher than they initially anticipated.

Many first time buyers are budgeting for things such as deposits, mortgage repayments, and shopping, but are failing to get prices for essentials such as utilities, insurance cover, and the like. In addition, many fail to account for costs such as petrol and general spending money when they are working out affordability, and this can come as a shock when they actually move in to the property and start paying out.

Buyers that are moving into a property for the first time and are therefore unaccustomed to the services they will need and the cost of these services are advised to seek advice prior to accepting any mortgage offer, otherwise they could find themselves in a property with a mortgage but may not be able to afford to live there.

Common things such as monthly or weekly shopping, home insurance cover, television licence, utilities, broadband or Internet costs, mobile phone usage costs, and general day to day spending money are amongst the things that many first time buyers fail to budget for when working out whether they can actually afford to buy and live in their own property.

One first time buyer who purchased a property last year said that it was a shock over the first month or so as she realised how many things she hadn’t budgeted for before moving in.

She said: “I’ve had to change my lifestyle completely because of the amount that I am actually paying out compared to the amount I had budgeted for. I wish I’d spent more time working out my budget rather than rushing to buy a property.”

Tags: first time buyer, costs, budget, finance, mortgage, Mortgage loan

Estate agents claim HIPs affecting the market

According to many estate agents the controversial Home Information Packs, of HIPs, are having an adverse effect on the housing market, with fewer homeowners with larger properties now putting their homes up for sale.

According to the National Association of Estate Agents there are fewer larger properties on the market now than is normally expected at this time of the year. Many estate agents put this down to consumer reluctance to deal with Home Information Packs, which have been at the centre of controversy since they were introduced.

HIPs are now required for all homes being sold that have three or more bedrooms. Eventually HIPs will be rolled out to all sizes of properties that are being sold, and there are concerns that this could affect the market further. According the government officials the Home Information Packs are of benefit to consumers. However, many industry professionals disagree and state that the packs are harming the housing market and putting many homeowners off selling.

The Chief Executive of the National Association of Estate Agents stated: “Clearly everyone accepts that there are a number of financial and economic factors that have caused the market to take a breather after seven hectic years. However, these figures show that there is an anomaly between instructions on properties where a Hip is required and where one is not.”

He also said: “With sales slowing and normally a traditional autumn bulge in instructions, it would be normal to expect stock levels to be significantly higher. This once again appears to show the adverse effect Hips are having on the market, the lives of consumers and indeed the overall economy.”

Alan Wright
13th November 2007

Tags: packs, estate, costs, information, home, real, homeowners, problems, houses

Figures show increase in bankrupt pensioners

Recent figures have shown that the number of pensioners in the UK that are going bankrupt has doubled in the space of five years.

There are now twice as many pensioners declaring themselves bankrupt as there were five years ago according to the figures. In the past year around 7% of bankruptcies were made up of pensioners, but in 2002 the number of pensioners that made up total bankruptcy figures equated to just 2% according to records.

Some experts have stated that it is increased life expectancy that has had an impact on the finances and savings of pensioners, tipping many over the financial edge and resulting in bankruptcy. This, state experts, has been made worse by the rises in the cost of living, fuel, and other areas, which has put further strain on pensioners’ finances. The research also shows that there appear to be more pensioners going bankrupt in rural areas compared to urban areas.

One insolvency expert stated: “More and more pensioners are going bankrupt as they struggle to repay debts when their pension is their sole source of income. Although attitudes towards bankruptcy have changed dramatically since the days of debtors’ prisons, the older generation still feel the stigma of bankruptcy and are reluctant to ask for help until it’s too late.”

Around 1250 bankrupts around the UK took part in the research. It is thought that the reason for the higher concentration of bankrupt pensioners in rural areas is the result of fewer work opportunities and higher transportation costs.

Some industry officials state that the cost of food – on which many pensioners spend a large proportion of their income – is contributing to the financial strain faced by many in this age group. Food price inflation rose from 2.5%in July to 2.8% in August according to figures.

Tom Smith
3rd November 2007

Tags: finances, bankrupt, old, plan, age, debt, longer, bankruptcy

Inflation Report Signals Further Rate Rise

The Bank of England has given clear signals that interest rates may have to rise yet again to make sure that it keeps inflation under control. Homeowners will be dreading the possibility of yet another rate rise as they have seen five quarter point rises already ion the past 12 months.

Experts now believe that the rise will come sooner rather than later after the Governor of the Bank, Mervyn King, said that he believed the turmoil in credit markets – set off by the sub-prime crisis in the US – was far from being an international financial crisis. Given that comment, experts think that he will not be afraid of recommending a further rate rise in the UK in the near future. Indeed, there are some doom-mongers who suggest that an interest rate of 6.5% – or even higher – could be reached.

A quarter point rise on a mortgage of £110,000 would mean an increase in monthly repayments of over £16, and on a mortgage of £200,000 the increase would be £30 a month.

A further quarter point rise now looks likely in September. Mr King said: “[We] cannot be sure if what we’re seeing so far foreshadows a more disruptive move on the markets or whether there’s a more gradual easing of pressure that allows credit spreads to widen to more sensible levels. So it’s impossible at this stage to judge how large and how persistent the tightening of credit conditions is likely to be.”

Adding that he did not see the recent events, which have seen some US investment banks in trouble because of defaults on loans and some big takeovers postponed, as an international financial crisis, he went on: “We are seeing signs of bad loans arising clearly in the US, but I don’t think we are seeing signs of these bad loans in other markets. The developments in [the widening of] spreads is a more realistic pricing of risks which we welcome.”

Mr King said that it was not the duty of central banks to give protection to any financial institutions if they get in trouble for poor lending practices.

The Bank’s quarterly inflation report said that inflation would come back down to 2% if interest rates rose according to market expectations, and that would be one more quarter point rise before the end of the year. It is difficult to see the Monetary Policy Committee waiting too long before implementing the rise. The report said that risks to inflation remained on the upside but not as much as a few months ago. It now expects economic growth to dip to 2.5% in the next two years from about 3% now.

Mr King was concerned that official figures did not accurately measure the strength of the economy, and may be revised upwards. The near term outlook for inflation had the bad news of higher food prices from flooding influencing it.

Inflation was also under threat from rising oil prices and potentially increasing wages demands, but Mr King did note that consumer spending was cooling. However, there has been surprise at the resilience of consumer and housing markets despite the five rises since last August.

Mr King insisted that 6% was not yet a done deal.

Tom Smith
1st October 2007

Tags: increase, costs, inflation, housing, rates

Mortgage Fees Go Through The Roof

Homebuyers are being neatly trapped into taking out what are on the face of it good value deals only to be knocked with sky-high fees. These have soared so much that some lenders have hiked arrangement fees by over 600% in the last two years.

By seeming to have low interest rates mortgage lenders can push themselves further up best-buy tables, but in fact they are making money by charging ever-higher arrangement fees.

Intelligent Finance, a subsidiary of biggest mortgage lender Halifax, now charges an arrangement fee of £2,999 in some cases – up by an incredible 601% on its maximum charge two years ago. The actual cost of arranging a mortgage can’t have gone up by £2,500 in the last two years! In fact, costs are likely to have gone down thanks to computerisation. The huge increase finds its way straight into the provider’s coffers.

Finance experts say that the practice tricks borrowers, in a period when interest rates have hit their highest level since March 2001. Lenders use the headline interest rate to attract customers, and then use arrangement fees to make their money.

Scottish Widows, part of Lloyds TSB, now has a maximum fee of £1,999, up from £295 two years ago and Abbey, Nationwide, Northern Rock and Woolwich, part of Barclays, have all increased their fees dramatically too.

Some lenders charge an arrangement fee as a percentage of the loan, so someone borrowing £300,000 would have to pay an arrangement fee three times higher than someone taking out a £100,000 loan. This is scarcely justifiable as the work involved is just the same.

Homebuyers are advised not be lured by the appealing low headline rates, but to verify all fees and include them in calculations to get the true cost of a loan. For first-time buyers houses are more unaffordable than the last housing market crash 16 years ago, and. Stamp duty is capturing more people than ever before, and it is obvious why so many people are having financial problems with the increasing cost of moving, or simply owning a home.

In May 60% of first-time buyers had to pay stamp duty, as the average price of a home reached £155,000, and the zero stamp duty threshold is well below that at £125,000. An average first-time buyer now has to spend four years eleven months saving for stamp duty, legal fees and a 5% deposit to come up with the £9,844 needed. In 2005 the time needed was eleven months less.

An interesting statistic in the current environment is that the number of mortgage approvals has risen again, according to the Bank of England’s data, with 114,000 loans approved in May compared with 109,000 in April. That will only make a further rise in interest rates highly likely.

On the other hand, house price growth did cool in May. The average home in the UK cost £211,056 in the year to the end of May, up 10.9%. This is down from a rate of increase of 11.3% for the same period to April.

Tom Smith
25th Septmeber 2007

Tags: Loans, stamp, costs, introductory, fees, Mortgages, rates, charges

Have you lost track of your account?

The government and the British Banker’s Association are working together to try and deal with the issue of dormant bank accounts, where banks are unable to trace the owners of account, which have been left dormant for years with no transactions being made on them.

Accounts that have not bee touched for three years or more are generally classed as dormant, and both the government and the BBA have been looking at ways to try and deal with this issue.

The priority is to try and reunite these dormant bank accounts with the account holders, as even though the account is classed as dormant the money in it is still the account holders. Many accounts have just a few pounds in them, and there are also many dating back ten years or more when many people were opening a number of accounts with £100 deposit in order to cash in with a windfall in the event that the building society became a bank or there was some sort of merger.

So far a number of accountholders have been successfully reunited with their lost accounts. One BBA spokesperson stated: ‘Already this year, we’ve processed 6,000 claims. This compares with 7,000 for the whole of last year.’ Those that think that they have a dormant account are being encouraged to contact the British Bankers Association for further information and to make a claim to the account either by phone or via the BBA website, which is www.bba.org.uk

The government is also looking into options for the use of money from accounts that are not claimed by any consumer. A commission was set up 18 months ago to deal with this, and it is likely that monies from unclaimed accounts will be used towards a number of worthy causes.

Tom Smith
27th August 2007

Tags: bank, charges, claim, uk, accounts, personal, costs, savings, current

Bank may have equipment seized

A branch of the Abbey bank in Chorley, Manchester, has been threatened by bailiffs following its failure to adhere to a court order and repay past overdraft charges to a customer that took it to court.

Sam Umaar sued the Abbey over the repayment of illegal bank charges amounting to nearly £3000. However, despite a court order instructing the bank to make payment to the customer no action was taken.

Sam Umaar sued the Abbey over bank charges that amounted to £2493. These were charges that the bank had applied to his account for exceeding his overdraft limit – charges that have now been described as unlawful and unfair by financial regulators in the UK. Mr Umaar’s case went to court in June, and because the Abbey did not show up to defend itself the judge granted an additional £276 to Mr Umaar, bringing the total judgement to £2769.

However, despite the court order the Abbey still did not pay up, and now bailiffs have visited the branch and given officials seven days to pay up. If this is not done the bailiffs state that they will seize equipment to the value of the sum owed. This has been done in the past with other banks, where equipment such as computers, faxes, printers, and other office and banking equipment has been taken in order to make the bank pay up in accordance with the court order.

Mr Umaar stated: “It’s ludicrous that the Abbey haven’t paid up when they know they have to.”

He added: “The bailiff says I will get my money – it is just a matter of when.” Officials from the Abbey have stated that the cheque has now been issued to Mr Umaar, and that bailiffs have been notified of this.

Tom Smith
11th July 2007

Tags: bank, bailiffs, costs, fees, abbey, unpaid, judge, charges, cheque

Consumers outraged by judge’s bank charge decision

A number of consumers in the UK are outraged at the decision of a judge in Hull who plans to dismiss their court cases against a number of banks.

Around twenty customers who have taken their banks to court over reclaiming bank charges have been told that the cases are likely to be dismissed as a result of the recent case won by Lloyds TSB. Lloyds was the first bank to win a case, when the Birmingham judge ruled in the banks favour rather than in favour of the plaintiff, Kevin Berwick, who was seeking over £2500.

Despite officials from the Financial Ombudsman Service stating that the Lloyds TSB case is not a definitive one, the judge from Hull, Ian Besford, has cited this case in his decision to dismiss the cases against Lloyds TSB, Barclays, and HSBC. The cases are due to be heard on July 4th. A number of the consumers concerned have contacted the BBC with regards to the issue.

A spokesperson from Consumer Action Group stated: ‘Kevin Berwick lost in his case in Birmingham because he didn’t supply enough evidence. This judge in Hull seems to be striking out the claims before he has even seen the detailed evidence of each claimant.’

However, the judge has stated that he plans to dismiss the cases because there appears to be ‘no reasonable prospect of success in the light of the recent decision’ regarding the Lloyds TSB case.

This is the first judge to have referred to the Birmingham Lloyds TSB case in his decision. A court official from Hull stated: ‘It is entirely up to each judge to decide for himself if the Birmingham judgement is an interpretation of the law he agrees with.’

Tom Smith
12th June 2007

Tags: fees, ruling, judge, bank, charges, penalties, claim, costs

Bank charge firms to be investigated

On the back of current investigations that are being carried out into the charges applied to customers’ accounts by banks in the UK by regulatory bodies, a further investigation will now be carried out into the various firms that have sprung up claiming to be able to help consumers to recover these charges – for a fee.

Regulators will now be looking into and scrutinizing these firms amidst fears that many consumers may be wasting their money on paying unnecessary fees for a task that they can carry out themselves free of charge, other than paying for copy statements.

UK regulators have been looking into unfair and unlawful charges that have been charged to customers’ accounts by banks for some months, and as a result of this many consumers have managed to claim back charges and fees going back up to six years, which in some cases has amounted to thousands. However, in light of the increasing number of people attempting to claim back fees from their banks a number of companies have sprung up with offers of assistance in exchange for fees.

These companies will now be investigated by the Ministry of Justice, and amongst the practices that will be looked into by the ministry is cold calling, where company representatives phone up consumers to try and talk them into letting them help claim back charges. However, consumers can just as easily do this themselves for the cost of a duplicate statement, and without having to pay any further charges.

In a recent case Lloyds Bank won a case where a man had tried to make a claim for his charges, and this was the first case to be won by a bank in relation to these charges. In other cases banks have failed to justify the charges, and consumers have been able to reclaim them. 

Tom Smith
24th May 2007

Tags: won, regulators, unfair, reclaim, bank, penalties, costs, fees

UK banks investigations widen

Regularity bodies in the UK are set to widen their studies into banking and bank charges after months of investigations into bank charges have already been carried out.

The Office of Fair Trading and other financial regulators in the UK have been looking into the fairness of extortionate charges for exceeding an overdraft, having a returned cheque, or having a returned direct debit. Banks have been charging up to forty pounds or more in some cases in these situations.

The bank charges have been branded unlawful and unfair by regulators, and as a result many consumers have been able to reclaim their charges going back up to six years, and sometimes amounting to thousands of pounds. The OFT is likely to make a decision later this year on what is deemed a fair charge for administration that costs the bank between £2 and £5. In the meantime, consumers continue to try and reclaim their past charges.

Now that the study and review has been extended it is being described as one of the largest investigations into banking ever carried out. As part of the extended investigation regulators will be looking into the costs of banking, how the end of free banking might affect consumers and the economy, and will also continue to assess the fairness of bank charges. It is thought that placing a low ceiling limit on these charges could result in many banks charging all customers a monthly fee for holding a current account.

With regards to extending the investigation one OFT official stated: “This will provide the necessary context for assessing the fairness of unauthorised overdraft and returned item charge before we apply the law in this area.” 

A National Consumer Council official also commented on the situation, stating: “Banks must deliver a fair deal for consumers and stop dragging their customer service reputation further into the mud by waiting for regulatory action.”

Tom Smith
15th May 2007

Tags: penalty, investigation, costs, regulators, charges, fees, accounts

Are You Paying For Your Cash Back Credit Card?

The offer seems to be too good to be true.  Spend money on your credit card and your provider will give you cash back on the card as part of your credit card loyalty program.  The more you spend, the more cash back you become entitled to. This all sounds well and good, but if you’re not careful you may very well find out that it is you who are paying for the cash back bonus you’re getting, not your UK credit card provider.

In order for your cash back reward program to work in your favor you need to be a disciplined credit card user.  This does not mean that you should not use your credit card, or only use it in certain circumstances.  In fact, you really should be using the card as often and as much as you can if you want to take the full benefit of the loyalty program.  What it does mean, however, is that you need to make sure that you clear your credit card balance at the end of each credit card statement billing date.  If you fail to clear your credit card balance on the statement due date, and you carry-over your credit card balance to the next month, then you start to become the person paying for your cash back rewards, not your credit card provider.

The reason why it is so important that you do not carry over a credit card balance to the next payment statement date is because you need to avoid incurring any interest or fees if you want to benefit from the cash back loyalty program.  As soon as you lose this, any benefit you would have got from your cash back credit card loyalty program will be cancelled out by the interest and fees you need to pay for carrying over a balance on the card.  Indeed, you may well find that the interest and fees you pay each month for carrying over the balance on your credit card will exceed any cash back you would be entitled to.  Unfortunately, this aspect of cash back credit cards is something that UK credit card providers are relying on in order to fund the cash back they’re offering you in the first place.

Consequently, if you are the type of UK credit card user who pays off their credit card statement balance at the end of each billing cycle, then having a cash back credit card loyalty program can prove to be very lucrative for you.  However, if like 60% or so of the other users of UK credit cards you are a borrower on your credit card, then it is very likely that you should look for some form of alternative loyalty program or, more importantly, a credit card that offers you a lower monthly interest rate than your current card provider offers, as, in the long run, this is very likely going to save you more money.

If you are in any doubt as to whether or not a UK cash back credit card is for you, be honest with yourself and ask yourself whether or not you have the discipline to pay off your credit card statement each month.  If the answer to this question is yes, then this card is working for you.  If the answer is no, you are paying for your credit card cash back loyalty program offer – and then some.

Richard Smith
13th May 2007

More Information:

• Cash Back or Rewards – What’s Your Preference?
• Available Types Of Credit Cards
• Credit Card Charges

External Links:

• More cash back credit card offers from CardGuide.co.uk
• Cash Back or Rewards – You Choose
  Not sure which would be the best for your spending levels? This article discusses the advantages and limitations of bothtype of credit card offers

Tags: charges, cards, rewards, spend, costs, credit

Costs are recouped on credit card penalty ceiling limits

In 2006 financial regulators in the UK reviewed the penalty charges that were being imposed on the accounts of credit card holders that made late payments or went over the agreed credit limit on the card, even if only by a few pounds.

In many cases these charges were set at around thirty pounds – sometimes more depending on the card issuer or credit card company. As a result of the review, financial regulators in the UK enforced a new rule that meant that banks and credit card companies in the UK could not charge more than twelve pounds in this sort of situation – a move that cost many card issuers and companies a fortune in lost revenue.

However, it seems that many banks are now trying to recoup the revenue that has been lost through the ceiling limits placed on these cards by finding other ways to try and get money out of card holders. They are doing this by pushing up the cost of making transactions through cash machines, charging customers huge amounts of interest for the privilege of using their card to withdraw cash from machines.

A spokesperson from the price comparison website Uswitch stated:  ‘Consumers could be forgiven for thinking that they are being treated as the banking industry’s personal ATM. It’s easy to see why the major banks continue to announce record profits, which this year alone totalled in excess of £40bn, when the welfare of their customers continues to take a backseat to shareholders.’

According to Uswitch the amount of interest charged for cash withdrawals has rocketed recently, going from around twenty percent in 2005 to over twenty seven percent. Card issuers have also reduced interest free periods on credit cards.

Tom Smith
25th April 2007

• Credit Card Charges

Tags: charges, costs, cards, penalty, credit, issuers

Motor insurance set to rocket in the UK

Motorists in the UK are set to face huge increases in motor insurance over the next year according to recent reports relating to some of the larger motor insurance companies in the UK. It has been reported that the biggest motor insurer in the UK could be whacking up the cost of premiums in 2007, increasing the gap even further between the prices from some major insurers and some of the cheaper motor insurance companies.

Unfortunately, the large rise in premiums could mean that those companies currently seen as budget insurance companies, which are able to offer huge discounts, could also be forced to push up premiums, making it even more costly to own and drive a car in the UK. Norwich Union has already raised premiums by up to forty percent over the past few months, and other major players are set to follow.

The largest motor vehicle insurer, the Royal Bank of Scotland, is now set to follow suit and push up its insurance premium rates, and smaller companies could follow. One spokesperson from the Admiral Group stated: ‘We believe Royal Bank of Scotland Insurance is the decisive factor in taking the market up in price. If it were to sustain a series of increases over the next 12 to 18 months, that would take rates up substantially.’

According to statistics forthcoming rises could push up an average insurance premium of around seven hundred and fifty pounds to around nine hundred pounds. Officials from the Royal Bank of Scotland Insurance stated that the rises were largely due to the heft cost of claims that had been made over recent years. An AA spokesperson also spoke about the rises, stating: ‘You will find people will shop around even more now. The market is going to be even more polarised between the highest and lowest prices.’

Tags: motor, rbs, accidents, increase, aa, Insurance, claims

HSBC Becomes First UK Bank To End ‘Free’ Banking

20 years after HSBC and Barclays introduced the concept of free banking to the UK, HSBC have announced that it is now time to pull the plug on this popular product and re-introduce a charge for using its banking services.

At present, HSBC has announced that it will limit charging the fee to its online banking arm, First Direct.  Moreover, the fee charge of £10 per month will not be applied to all customers of First Direct.  The “lucky” First Direct customers who will find themselves subject to the £10 monthly fee will be those who fail to make deposits of at least £1,500 per month or those who do not maintain an average balance of £1,500 on their current accounts.

While it is true to say that the UK has remained one of a very few select countries to maintain free current account banking for those bank customers who do not go overdrawn, over time this has probably been one of the most popular products that major UK banks have offered.  Nevertheless, it seems, in this case, that the success of free current account banking in the UK has also been its eventual down-fall, with many leading UK banks having made grumbling noises over the past year or so that the because the UK has free current account banking, this no longer makes the banks competitive with their European and American competition, the majority of whom already charge for current account services.

To many of the 1.3 million customers of First Direct, however, this is going to be a bitter pill to swallow.  UK banks made record profits in 2005, so to now be told that the bank is no longer competitive with its overseas rivals merely because it has not been arbitrarily applying a monthly fee  £10 on certain financially disadvantaged customers may just sound a little like sour grapes.

Thankfully, other leading UK banks, such as Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays, HBOS and Lloyds TSB, have decided not to follow the lead of HSBC at this time.  However, with most UK bank’s looking to recoup the estimated £1 billion in lost revenue following the Office of Fair Trading’s forced cut to penalties applied on late credit card payments, it would need optimism of the highest order to believe they won’t follow suit soon, a view clearly echoed by a spokeswomen for Royal Bank of Scotland, owners of Nat West, who, when asked RBS’s stance on the issue, was quoted as saying that: “There are no current plans, but you can never completely rule options out in the long term”.

In the meantime, the estimated 200,000 customers of First Direct who are likely to be directly affected by this latest move now have until February 2007, when the new charges will come into effect, to either get their accounts in order so that they do not fall foul of the new charges or to look for alternative free banking arrangements. 

Kindly, however, First Direct have given the 200,000 or so estimated customers it says will likely be effected by this move a ‘get out of jail’ free card: the bank will agree to waive the fee if the customer agrees to take out another First Direct product – such as a loan or insurance. 

Tags: uk, charges, costs, Insurance, lloyds

Extended Mortgage Terms Means Huge Amounts of Interest For Consumers

The rising property prices in the UK over the years have resulted in many people losing out on the chance to get their foot on the property ladder.

And because of this, over recent years, many banks and building societies have started to offer longer mortgage repayment terms over and above the traditional twenty-five year mortgage, as well as offering higher salary multiples, in a bid to attract consumers that are desperate to get onto the property ladder. Over recent years many lenders have been offering thirty and thirty-five year mortgage repayment terms.

However, experts are now concerned because some lenders have started offering even longer repayment terms, with up to fifty-seven years now being offered as a mortgage repayment term option with some mortgage providers. These mortgages have been labelled as ‘madness’ by experts, who state that although the monthly repayments will be lower for consumers because of the extended term, rising interest rates and the amount of time for which the borrower will be in debt could prove a real problem.

One director of a mortgage broker stated: “Life-long mortgages are a false economy. You end up paying literally tens of thousands of pounds in extra interest. It really is not a sensible thing to do. The idea of paying off a mortgage for 40, 50 or even 57 years is madness.”

With average house prices in the UK rising to well over two hundred thousand pounds, and with interest rates rising to five percent, a number of lenders have made changes to the mortgages that they offer in terms of the length of the mortgages available and the amount that can be borrowed. This is to attract more custom from those that would otherwise be unable to purchase a property.

Tags: years, debt, costs, terms, Mortgages, price, owe

The Pros And Cons Of A Business Credit Card

There are hundreds of business credit cards from banks and other business service providers. In fact, there are so many that it can be difficult to choose the right one.  Here’s a guide to what you should look at when choosing a business credit card and what to avoid to make sure your business stays financially healthy.

Business Card Advantages

One of the main advantages of a business credit card is that it can be used to manage cash flow. Business owners and their employees can use business credit cards to pay for goods or services that require immediate payment. At the same time, they can benefit from an interest holiday of up to 56 days before the money is deducted from their business accounts. Deferring payments in this way can be very useful for business owners.

Another key advantage benefits both employers and employees. When employees travel on business they often have to pay for hotels, car hire, flights, meals and business entertaining. In many cases, this comes out of their pocket and they have to wait to be reimbursed. Using a business credit card means that employees can charge these business expenses straight to the business without waiting for reimbursement. This keeps their personal finances healthy.

Saving Accounting Time

For employers, this practice has another advantage. Hours and hours of accounting time (and business money) can be spent on sorting out employees’ expenses. This workload is much reduced with a business credit card. While businesses may choose to have the backup of having employees submit expense reports, the business credit card statement may be enough. Each month, business owners get a statement that itemises all transactions on the business account, regardless of which employee made them. Some business accounts offer advanced reporting features that will help with VAT calculations.

Business Card Disadvantages

Despite these advantages, there are a couple of major disadvantages to business credit cards. For example, if an employee accidentally or deliberately reveals card details, there could be expensive transactions on the account. Even if the employee has committed a fraud, the business may still be liable. Such situations can also take a long time to sort out.

The other potential issue is the same for business credit card holders as it is for personal credit card holders. Money spent on a credit card is actually debt. With preferential interest rates and long interest free periods, business owners will need to make sure that they don’t get into a cycle of debt. This could seriously damage the long term financial health of their business.

Other Business Finance Options

For this reason, it is also worth considering other financing options for the business. A business debit card, for example, keeps tight control of access to the account. In addition, business owners cannot spend more than they have in the account, unless they have agreed an overdraft facility. A business loan is another option worth serious consideration. Whichever option business owners go for, it is essential to manage finances prudently and avoid getting into long term debt.

Tags: accounts, personal, credit, apply, business, details, expenses

Brits Seriously Undervaluing the Cost of Their Home Contents

New research published by Legal & General indicates that most Brits are seriously undervaluing the cost of replacing their home contents when it comes to filing a home contents insurance policy. 

The average UK homeowner currently values the possession in their home to worth a mere £14,300, whereas the actual cost of replacing most items found in an average UK home would likely cost more than £38,000.  Alone, the average UK living room now contains electrical and other goods that make the value of replacing these exceed £10,500.

With research undertaken recently by the Halifax Home Insurance showing that burglaries and house theft levels in the UK increasing by as much as 8%. During the winter months, UK home insurance providers are not only cautioning homeowners to take extra precautions to ensure the safety of their homes but are also asking policyholders to take a careful look around their home and make sure they are reflecting a true value to the value of the contents.

Moreover, with the average UK homeowner unlikely to amend their home contents insurance dramatically year-on-year, a big question remains whether UK households take into account items purchased for their homes in the previous calendar year when renewing their home contents insurance.  Given that new electronic items can be expensive, UK home contents insurance policyholders should also be taking a close look at whether or not the threshold value of home contents is being reached and whether or not new expensive items need to be reported individually when renewing a home contents insurance policy. 

Special attention should also be given to any new jewellery items you may have purchased in the last year, as these are also unlikely to be covered under any general home contents insurance policy unless they have been specifically identified.  In this regard, it is generally advised that any UK household photograph new items purchased so that they can keep a log of all of the items in their home.  Photographing home contents is also much easier when it comes to making any claim on your UK home contents insurance policy.

Reflecting this general opinion among home contents insurance providers in the UK, Andy Dawson, operations director at Legal & General, commented, “From the survey findings it would appear that insurance cover loss of property from the home could be over £20,000 below the level it should be.  We would suggest that everyone take the research findings as a prompt to review their home contents and check the insurance cover they have in place”.

Tags: damage, contents, Insurance, break, belongings, in, fire