Is a ‘friends’ mortgage’ a good idea?
In the past most people that were buying a home either did so alone or with a partner/husband, which was the traditional way of getting a first home. However, things have really changed over recent years, and these days many people cannot afford to buy a home on their own.
This means that many have had to look at alternatives when it comes to moving out from their parents or from rented accommodation and trying to get their foot onto the property ladder, and things aren’t always easy, particularly given the difficulties that many face when it comes to raising a deposit and getting a mortgage in the current financial climate.
One of the solutions that some people have considered is to get a mortgage out with a friend, whereby both friends – or a group – are all in on the mortgage and they buy the property between them. This can certainly solve a few problems, such as being able to raise the amount needed for the deposit and being able to borrow the amount required for the property.
However, this can cause issues in the event that one of the friends involved wants to sell up and move on, as it means that they would have to get rid of their share of the mortgage. Another problem is if there is a falling out, and whilst most friends hope that they will never come to blows to a degree where things cannot be resolved this can happen.
Whilst a friends’ mortgage can be a good way of getting onto the property ladder in the current financial climate it is important for anyone getting involved to ensure that they consider both the pros and cons before making any firm decision or commitment, as things otherwise turn very sour very quickly – and it could end up being a costly mistake.
For those that do not really want to get involved in a mortgage with someone else but do want to get onto the property ladder another solution is to look at shared ownership, where only part of the property is purchased and the remainder is rented through a housing association and can be purchased in stages at a later date as and when the buyer is in a financial position to buy further shares in the home. The buyer then has the choice of buying the remainder of the home until it has all been purchased or remaining a part owner and selling their share when they decide to move on.
Tags: property, friends, mortgage, Mortgage loan, share
Don’t bail out friends and family with loans
October 6, 2007 by admin
Filed under News, News-Loans
A debt advice agency in the UK has warned that lending money to friends and family could have an adverse effect on both the lender and the borrower.
Officials from the Debt Advice Bureau claim that it is better to offer family and friends advice and support when they run into financial problems rather than throwing money at them by way of loans. In many cases these loans are not fully repaid and can put a strain on the relationship, and often this type of action results in people becoming reliant on loans from family and friends to bail them out if they get into financial difficulties.
Officials from the Debt Advice Bureau state that consumers should help family and friends to overcome debt and finance related problems rather than encouraging them to rely on others to help them out financially, as this can simply lead to a cycle of debt, and could even lead to the borrower getting themselves into debt in order to help out the family member of friend, which can make matters even worse.
One official from the bureau said that by lending money to friends and family consumers could be making the problem worse for all concerned.
He stated: “You don’t want to be laying the groundwork that every time they have a slight cashflow problem, you come to the rescue.”
Official figures show that in many cases the money that is lent to friends and family members is not received back in full, and in some cases is not repaid at all.
According to the results of a recent survey, only around 58% of 70% of consumers that had loaned money to family member had been fully repaid. Of the 59% that had lent money to a friend only 27% had been fully repaid.
Tom Smith
6th October 2007
