Payment Protection Insurance Cover

Anyone that takes out finance likes to have the peace of mind that they are protected against situations that could render them unable to make repayments, and payment protection insurance cover is an effective way to do this. Read more

Competition Commission still investigating PPI

The controversy over payment protection insurance has been going on for some time now, and regulators have been investigating the problems surrounding the sale of PPI after it was found that many consumers were being mis-sold this insurance, and that in some cases the cost of PPI was higher than the interest costs on a loan.

The Competition Commission has stated that its investigation into PPI is still ongoing as no conclusions have yet been reached.

The Competition Commission has stated that the issues that are being considered are complex and therefore more time and consideration is required. The Competition Commission plans to publish its provisional findings in May of next year. The chairman of the inquiry stated that the Competition Commission had already reviewed a substantial amount of evidence, but added that there were areas that needed to be looked into further.

The chairman stated: “We are far from making up our minds. But we are focussing on the amount of competition for PPI that distributors face at the retail level.”

He added that the Competition Commission was aiming to complete the inquiry as soon as possible but had to take into consideration areas that needed to be looked at further. He said: “…we are also conscious that the issues we are deciding upon are by no means simple and it is vital that we carry out our work thoroughly, ensuring that all parties receive a fair hearing.”

A number of issues relating to PPI are being looked into by the Competition Commission. This form of cover is designed to protect against falling behind on repayments on loans, credit cards, and other forms of finance.

Alan Wright
13th November 2007

FSA to publish new PPI guidelines

The UK’s financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority, is to publish new guidelines in relation to Payment Protection Insurance on its website next year.

Payment Protection Insurance, or PPI, has been at the centre of controversy over the past year, with many claims that this type of insurance was being forced onto borrowers, mis-sold, and in some cases added onto finance deals without the consumers even knowing about it. Banks and lenders make a lot of profit on the sale of PPI, but in many cases customers end up with expensive policies that they cannot even benefit from.

Payment Protection Insurance is designed to help those taking out finance, such as credit cards, loans, and other forms of credit. The idea behind the cover is that consumers will be covered for a specified period in the event that they are unable to work and therefore make repayments due to redundancy, illness, or accidents. However, research was carried out by various agencies, and the industry came under severe criticism for the inappropriate sale of policies amongst other things.

Many people have ended up purchasing PPI that is not suited to their needs as a result of this mis-selling, and the FSA aims to steer customers towards suitable plans based on their needs via the website. Customers will be asked a number of questions on the site, and will then be able to view a choice of suitable policies so that they do not end up purchasing inappropriate PPI.

In addition to helping consumers to find the right PPI policies for their needs, the FSA has also promised that it will be taking far more stringent action and imposing far higher fines on companies that are found to be mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance in the future.

Tom Smith
4th November 2007

Nationwide stops PPI sales

The largest building society in Britain, the Nationwide, has stopped sales of Payment Protection Insurance with its financial products, after admitting that customers were not being properly advised with regards to PPI by staff members.

Payment Protection Insurance has been at the centre of controversy for some months after it was found that customers were being pushed into purchasing this non-compulsory cover, and that the cover was often being mis-sold inappropriately so that customers ended up purchasing a costly policy that they would never be able to benefit from.

The Financial Services Authority has been running a long term investigation into the sales of Payment Protection Insurance for two years, and is in the final phase of its review and investigation. The cover is designed to assist those that cannot keep up with repayments on their financial commitments due to accidents, illness, or redundancy, and is sold with products such as credit cards, loans, and other financial products that may need protection.

However, the review revealed that in many cases sales staff were mis-selling this policies, making the customer think that they cover was compulsory, and in some cases even adding PPI without the customers’ knowledge. This has led to a real crackdown on the sales of PPI after many people ended up purchasing policies that they were either not eligible to claim benefits on or that they were not even aware that they had purchased.

A Nationwide spokesman stated that the halt in sales of PPI is a temporary one, adding: ‘We did some mystery shopping and weren’t satisfied the sales processes were as robust as they should be, so they have been halted temporarily.’

Tom Smith
27th September 2007

The Pros And Cons Of Payment Protection Insurance

Lenders are always eager to convince borrowers to protect their repayments for loans, credit cards, store cards, mortgages and other financial products. And they have a point. People in the UK are saving less and borrowing more, with a high rate of debt. Read more

Only quarter of Brits have adequate insurance cover against loss of income

A recent study carried out has shown the low level of insurance protection cover amongst Brits against loss of income in comparison to the reliance of British households on more than one income. According to the study almost fifty percent of households in the UK rely on more than one income in order to cover living costs, spending, and expenses. However, only a quarter of Brits seems to have adequate insurance cover to protect against the loss of their income.

The data comes from the Scottish Widows Protection Report. The information from the report showed the low level of protection amongst Brits when it comes to insuring themselves against loss of income due to situations such as illness or death. The report also showed that the majority of Brits had less than two months salary in savings to cover them in the event that they ended up losing an essential income.

According to the report: “These findings show that if a breadwinner becomes long-term ill – or dies – the average household in the UK does not even have their essential expenditure covered – let alone enough money for those little luxuries.” The report also indicated that even those with over thirty thousand pounds in savings shouldn’t get too complacent about how they would manage in the event of a loss of income: “Many people aspire to do more than just ‘survive’ a crisis – they wish to maintain their current lifestyle.”

A spokesperson from Scottish Widows stated: “The majority of the population is walking a financial high wire without a safety net. Nobody knows what is around the corner, but we have to accept that all too often illness does strike and accidents do happen. If people don’t start to take responsibility for their own financial futures then they could be left in a position where they can’t even cover the essential expenditure in their lives.”