RICS states only rich can afford to be landlords

Officials from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors have stated that in the current economic climate only the rich can afford to become landlords, with investment properties being made inaccessible to many people because of the high level of deposit that many lenders are now demanding.

According to reports the level of deposit required on buy to let properties has increased by 500% since 2002, with the average deposit needed now being around 30% of the property value, equating to an average of around £65,600.

In the first quarter of 2002, according to the report, only around 8% or an average £10,100 was needed to invest in a buy to let property. RICS officials state that the high level of deposit needed means that many potential buy to let purchasers have been put off or simply cannot afford to get their foot on to the buy to let ladder.

However, the Institute states that the situation could ease somewhat next year, with interest rates likely to fall and house prices likely to drop or remain stable. This could see an increase in the number of consumers deciding to invest in buy to let.

One economist from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors stated: “It takes more capital than ever to set up a buy-to-let investment. Would-be investors who have missed out on the impressive returns of previous years are now finding the hurdles to property investment are higher than they imagined. However, existing landlords should be able to use the equity in their past investment properties to fund the deposit needed for new ones, and this should ensure that demand from the buy-to-let sector does not dry up entirely.”

Tom Smith
18th November 2007

Tags: equity, Mortgages, deposit, investment, surveyors, buy-to-let, landlord

Buy-to-let ‘out of reach’

The buy-to-let market is now out of reach of the ordinary investor, due to spiralling prices, it was claimed this week.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has found that the average deposit a would-be landlord needs to put down to get hold of a rental property is £65,000, or 30 per cent of the property’s value.

In early 2002, this figure was just £10,100.

The increase has been brought about by factors common across all parts of the housing market, such as high interest rates and contracting supply, but also by factors specific to buy-to-let.

In particular, rental cover ratios for mortgages are high, with most landlords being asked to ensure that rental yields on their properties will cover 125 per cent of the mortgage before a lender will consider handing the money over.

Senior economist at RICS David Stubbs said: “It takes more capital than ever to set up a buy-to-let investment. Would-be investors who have missed out on the impressive returns of previous years are now finding the hurdles to property investment are higher than they imagined.

“However, existing landlords should be able to use the equity in their past investment properties to fund the deposit needed for new ones, and this should ensure that demand from the buy-to-let sector does not dry up entirely.”

Tags: equity, Chartered, David Stubbs, RICS, royal, surveyors

HIPs In Place For Three Bedrooms

Estate agents are warning that the new Home Information Packs (HIPs) are going to cause a shortage of larger properties on the market. One agency reported that the number of large homes on offer for sale is down by 40% over the last 12 months, and experts in the industry are blaming the packs for the problems. Each pack costs around £500, and they have been compulsory for homes with four bedrooms and more since 1 August.

The Government says that the packs will shorten the time of the buying process, but agents claim that they are actually putting off sellers and pushing up prices as they try to cover costs. Each pack must include an energy performance certificate and standard searches.

Estate agency Chancellors said that it had seen a fall of 42% in the number of large homes being brought to market since 1 August when compared directly with the same period in 2006.

Many sellers are unhappy with the process. Some say that it verges on interrogation, with questions on construction dates, central heating, loft insulation and the use of low-energy light bulbs, and multiple photographs throughout the property. Some people have seen the process through to sale, but many more have not. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) said that 53% of its members reported a drop in the number of four bedroom homes put on the market since 1 August, compared with the same period last year – worse even than the Chancellors figure. This fall has not been in line with expectations, despite rising interest rates, stock market turmoil and the credit squeeze, and HIPs are being blamed.

Now, since Monday 10 September, HIPs are required for homes with three bedrooms, despite warnings from those within the housing market.

Jeremy Leaf, housing spokesman for RICS, is unhappy with the way the government has handled the implementation. He said: “I have never known legislation so badly introduced. Homeowners clearly have no faith in the packs or the policy, which have only brought more bureaucracy and mass uncertainty to an already paralysed market. Before they are heaped on the rest of homeowners, we need to see some evidence-based justification that this policy benefits consumers. At the moment it doesn’t exist.”

Nick Salmon, an estate agent and founder of the campaign group Splinta (Seller’s Pack Law is not the Answer), said: “I cannot think of any [benefits consumers have seen from HIPs]. There is a great deal of anger among homeowners who do not see the point of these packs and consider them another stealth tax. HIPs have simply heaped more expense at the wrong end of the transaction, and sellers have nothing but contempt for the new law.” The Government stands to boost its coffers by the VAT applied to the Packs.

There are still loopholes in the law. Sellers can avoid a HIP by 1) converting a bedroom to a study, 2) cancelling a pack after it has been ordered, as it only need to be ordered, not actually purchased, 3) pay the £200 fine for not having a HIP – much cheaper than the £500 a HIP costs. In fact, getting caught is unlikely as trading standards officials admit they don’t have the resources to enforce the packs.

Mr Salmon believes the government is running the risk of drying up the housing market by introducing HIPs for three bedroom properties. Gordon Brown, he claimed, may rue the day he passed up the chance to kill of HIPs.

Tom Smith
29th September 2007

Tags: packs, government, house, home, hips, fine

Has the housing market peaked?

According to recent figures the housing market in the UK may have peaked, as July’s figures show that the number of people looking to purchase their first home fell at the fastest rate in a period of three years.

Inquiries from first time buyers fell at the fastest pace since August 2004 according to the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, with number of unsold properties rising to its highest in the past eight months, all of which points towards the housing market in the UK having peaked.

According to officials the reason for the slump in inquiries from first time buyers is due to the series of interest rate rises, and more importantly due to the added threat of further interest rate rises. The Bank of England has already hiked rates up five times by 0.25% each time since last August, and many predict a further interest rate rise of 0.25% in the coming months, which would take the base rate up to 6%. The interest rate is already at its highest in the past six years.

Officials state that many first time buyers are taking a ‘wait and see’ stance, and are continuing to rent for a while whilst they assess the market and see what happens with the interest rates in the coming months. However, although demand seems to have fallen according to these figures, house prices in the UK rose yet again for the 21st consecutive month.

An official from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors stated: ‘The combination of softening demand and supply is causing market conditions to weaken further. Buyer activity has pulled back a little over fears that we may have seen the top of the market. With interest rates perched at 5.75% and a jump to 6% a strong possibility, aspiring first-time-buyers are continuing to rent until the market trend becomes clearer.’

Tom Smith
27th September 2007

Tags: cost, home, prices, mortgage, market, housing, surveyors

What the recent interest rate rise means for your mortgage repayments

On 11th May the Bank of England increased its rates by another 0.25% to 5.5%, meaning that six million homeowners in Britain will face bigger monthly payments for their mortgages. Read more

Tags: mortgage, inflation, interest, england, cost, surveyors, house

First-time buyers making sacrifices

First-time buyers are prepared to give up many of their creature comforts in a bid to get onto the property ladder.

That is according to research from Abbey, which shows that 53 per cent of people are willing to give up their holiday, while 49 per cent would be prepared to not drink alcohol.

Many potential buyers (21 per cent) say that they would sacrifice their independence by moving back to their parents’ home while saving for a mortgage.

A total of nine per cent of those asked are willing to take even more drastic action by splitting from their partner if it meant that they could buy a home sooner.

“With first-time buyers struggling to get onto the first rung of the property ladder, prospective homeowners are having to make big sacrifices to build their finances,” said Nici Gardiner, head of mortgages at Abbey.

“However with a typical first-time buyer taking as long as five years to save up a five per cent deposit, people would need an iron will to sacrifice anything they enjoy for that long.”

Recent figures from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors show that accessibility has got 230 per cent worse in the last ten years due to very sharp increases in house prices.

Abbey says that the average first-time buyer needs to raise £32,784 in order to get onto the property ladder, the equivalent of 81.8 per cent of the average joint income.

Tags: Gardiner, surveyors, anything, research, First-time